Geographical Association

One of the key objectives of the Geographical Association is to campaign for geography and its place in curriculum. In 2009 we published our manifesto, A Different View, which sets forth our belief that geography makes an essential contribution to a balanced education for all young people in schools, colleges and other settings. On this page you will find links to various other papers, articles and letters, written by members and staff of the GA over the years, that testify to our continuing commitment to geography education.

This document contains the GA's response to the joint DFID/DCSF Global Learning For Schools consultation sent in May 2010.

This document forms a joint response to the Department of Energy and Climate Change's Low Carbon Skills consultation. It was put together by the DEA in conjunction with the RSPB, the Geographical Association, People and Planet, the East Midlands Network for Global Perspectives in Schools, and Osborne Middle School. (May 2010)

Here is the GA's response to the Ofqual consultation entitled 'Regulating for confidence in standards' in March 2010. Ofqual requested feedback on how they should meet their objectives, fulfill their duties and use their powers. Note: As this consultation was completed online, The PDF is in the form of screengrabs.

A paper submitted to the House of Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee Evidence Session on Learning Outside the Classroom in February 2010. It argues for the importance of fieldwork and LOTC in geography.

This is the Geographical Association's response to the CFSA framework blueprint for subject association engagement with the Masters in Teaching and Learning (MTL) programme.

When the secondary curriculum was reviewed and subsequently implemented from September 2008, some amendments were proposed to the level descriptions to reflect changes to the secondary curriculum programmes of study. A consultation regarding the proposed revisions was issued by the DCSF. Here is the GA's response to the level description revisions proposed for geography.

The Children, Schools and Families Committee have been undertaking an inquiry into Initial Teacher Training (ITT). Here is the consultation response from the GA, prepared by the Teacher Education Special Interest Group, and complete with Appendices.

The GA's reponse to the 'Review of DFID's work to Build Support for Development through the education system'. Compiled on behalf of the Education Committee of the Geographical Association by Angus Willson. (Added 16.10.09)

This is the GA response to the primary curriculum reforms recommended by the Rose Review. Members of the GA that have contributed to this collaborative response include teachers, headteachers, lecturers, GA staff and consultants, LA representatives and members of the wider education authority. (Added 07.07.09)

This longer document compiles responses to the interim report of the Rose Review and attempts to show the relationship of geography to other elements of the whole primary school.

On 20 February 2009, The Cambridge Primary Review published a special, two-part report on the primary curriculum entitled 'Towards a New Primary Curriculum'. Here is a press release to the CfSA summarising the GA's response to the report.

This is a discussion paper about level descriptions and assessment in geography prepared by John Hopkin for the Education Committee in December 2006.

This is a discussion document. It follows a special seminar held on 26 February 2005 involving 21 leading members of the Association with direct teaching and other professional experience across all phases. The group drew from experience in teaching, teacher education, inspection, consultancy, ASTs, curriculum development projects and education research.

'The Power of Geography' is David Lambert's original response to the comments made by David Bell in November 2004.

Following the Ofsted report several newspapers ran articles on geography in November 2004. The GA sent a number of letters in response - this one went to the Sunday Telegraph.

'Why subjects really matter' is David Lambert's opinion piece on the importance of subjects in education written in January 2005.

In this article (Jan 2005) Peter Jackson and Doreen Massey discuss the importance of thinking geographically in an increasingly inter-dependent world.

The aim of this paper is to explain why achieving an improvement in the quality of pupils’ geographical understanding is, to a large degree, dependent on teachers gaining a clearer grasp of the nature of understanding, in general, and geographical understanding, in particular. By Trevor Bennetts, February 2005.

This is a revised version of an earlier paper discussing the development of a 14-19 humanities curriculum. By David Lambert and Martin Roberts, updated January 2005.

This QCA Geography Team report prepared by Michael Naish and Eleanor Rawling follows a summit held in January 2005 as part of the Futures Project. Visit the QCA Futures website and forum for more interesting papers and discussion.

David Lambert's response to an article by Chris Woodhead published in The Times on 3rd April 2005. The original article entitled 'Education: Teach facts not twaddle' can be viewed here.

Roy Laming of ESRI (UK) discusses the increasing use of GIS in a variety of capacities, and looks at ways in which it can be used to enhance geographical education.

This report is based on teacher focus group meetings, convened during May and June 2004. The aim was to discover more about the relative absence of ‘education for sustainable development’ (ESD) in the school curriculum. (added 30.09.05)

An edited version of this piece by David Lambert was published in the TES on Friday 3 November 2006. The article responded to the results of a poll in National Geographic Kids Magazine which revealed that 20% of British students cannot identify the British Isles on a world map. Read the TES article online. (Added 27.11.06)